Speed up uncompressed DDS reader - #9943
Open
akx wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
radarhere
reviewed
Sep 5, 2026
| for i, mask in enumerate(masks): | ||
| masked_value = value & mask | ||
| src += chunk | ||
| pixel_count = min(pixel_count, len(src) // bytecount) |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
len(src) // bytecount might be less if the image is truncated, but why would pixel_count ever be less? Why not always use len(src) // bytecount?
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follows up on #7589. I noticed this looking at
pytest --durations; a fuzzer test that just loads a DDS was surprisingly slow, and turns out doing 1-byte reads is not very efficient...Locally:
or 255.17 times lower minimum, or in average OPS terms, +22351.7% faster. 😂