Fix typos in sdk-common Javadoc

[thswlsqls]

Description

• Fix five Javadoc typos in the sdk-common module; text-only, no behavior or signature change.
• InternalTelemetryVersion: "prior the standardization" -> "prior to the standardization".
• Resource: "which capture identifying information" -> "which captures" (singular subject).
• RandomSupplier: "random number generater" -> "generator".
• DefaultExceptionAttributeResolver: drop stray () after the @see ...getDefault(boolean) reference.
• AndroidFriendlyRandomHolder: "everytime" -> "every time".

Testing done

• Docs-only, test-exempt: no test added; ./gradlew :sdk:common:check passed (compile, spotless, ErrorProne/NullAway, jApiCmp).
• No signature change, so jApiCmp produced no apidiff; not user-facing, so no CHANGELOG entry.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.77%. Comparing base (824334c) to head (41a111a).
⚠️ Report is 59 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #8512   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     78.77%   78.77%           
  Complexity     8579     8579           
=========================================
  Files          1009     1009           
  Lines         28993    28993           
  Branches       3599     3599           
=========================================
  Hits          22839    22839           
  Misses         5311     5311           
  Partials        843      843           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[jack-berg]

Hey @thswlsqls are you planning on picking back up and continuing any of these PRs you have open?

I'm not reviewing them while their in draft state. That's sort of an unwritten rule of the project.

If you no longer have time, consider just marking them all ready for review in bulk. I can merge, or close, or push minor changes and merge as needed.

Thanks

[thswlsqls]

Thanks @jack-berg — I'll mark them ready for review in bulk. Please merge, close, or push minor fixes as you see fit.

[otelbot]

Thank you for your contribution @thswlsqls! 🎉 We would like to hear from you about your experience contributing to OpenTelemetry by taking a few minutes to fill out this survey.