Skip to content

Fix customer feedback issue template#12866

Merged
gewarren merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
gewarren:issue-template
Jul 7, 2026
Merged

Fix customer feedback issue template#12866
gewarren merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
gewarren:issue-template

Conversation

@gewarren

@gewarren gewarren commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Update to match dotnet/docs and prevent description auto-reset.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 7, 2026 15:35
@gewarren gewarren requested a review from a team as a code owner July 7, 2026 15:35
@gewarren gewarren enabled auto-merge (squash) July 7, 2026 15:36

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the customer feedback issue form and related issue-closing policy configuration to align with dotnet/docs behavior and avoid unintended “description reset”/auto-close scenarios for feedback-created issues.

Changes:

  • Updates the customer feedback issue form YAML (issue template) structure.
  • Removes the “close learn template issues with empty descriptions (spam)” automation block from the close-issues policy.
  • Minor whitespace/formatting cleanup in the close-issues policy file.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
.github/policies/close-issues.yml Removes the automation that labeled/replied/closed issues matching “empty description” patterns; minor formatting cleanup.
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/z-customer-feedback.yml Modifies the customer feedback issue form by removing the textarea field id.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/z-customer-feedback.yml:28

  • This textarea is missing an id. In GitHub issue forms, input/textarea fields are expected to have an id (and this repo’s other issue template does), so omitting it can make the template invalid or break field persistence/automation that depends on the field key.
  - type: textarea
    validations:
      required: true
    attributes:
      label: Description

@BillWagner BillWagner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM.

@gewarren gewarren merged commit 46978a7 into dotnet:main Jul 7, 2026
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants