Add most tests to CMake build and fix some test dependencies

[Flamefire]

Although BoostTestJamfile is used many tests are not included in the CMake build because they are not of the form run source.cpp ; but specify extra dependencies

I replaced that call by a small Jamfile parser that knows about the dependencies.

This surfaced a few dependency issues in the Jamefile:

• The dependency on Boost.Random is already set for all targets, so does not need to be added again
• boost_bind was missing from the math tests although given the C++11 base it could now be eliminated
• boost_iterator was missing from one test
• test_random_device was always compiled as static and shared, also compiling all dependencies twice. CI uses ./b2 link=static,shared explicitly which I'd say is a cleaner way to test than basically forcing this

Also a mini-change to avoid the deprecation warning from Boost.Bind

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.79%. Comparing base (21b0544) to head (2a8c4de).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #158   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    95.79%   95.79%           
========================================
  Files          117      117           
  Lines         7660     7660           
========================================
  Hits          7338     7338           
  Misses         322      322           

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
test/test_comp_xoshiro128pp.cpp	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
test/test_qrng_functions.hpp	100.00% <ø> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 21b0544...2a8c4de. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[mborland]

This looks like a lot of overlap with #158, but since that one already has a conflict, I will merge this one.

[Flamefire]

This looks like a lot of overlap with #158, but since that one already has a conflict, I will merge this one.

You meant #156? I included this PR there to be able to debug that. Will rebase