Skip to content

Restrict trigger push branch for GitHub Workflow#3500

Open
apupier wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
apupier:3.8-dev-configureTriggerPushForGitHubWorkflows
Open

Restrict trigger push branch for GitHub Workflow#3500
apupier wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
apupier:3.8-dev-configureTriggerPushForGitHubWorkflows

Conversation

@apupier

@apupier apupier commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Feature branches rarely need their own CI runs: the code is already tested when a pull request is opened against a release branch. If the push trigger has no branch restriction and pull_request is also configured, every push to a branch with an open PR runs the workflow twice: once for the push and once for the PR synchronisation.

Always give the push trigger an explicit list of branches: this stops branches created from a release branch from inheriting its workflow runs.

see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=430408443#GitHubActionsRecommendedPractices-Restrictthepushtriggertospecificbranches

ignoring only dependabot branches as it seems that several feature branches are created on the main Apache tinkerpop repository. The dependabot case should already cut most if the duplicate workload

Feature branches rarely need their own CI runs: the code is already
tested when a pull request is opened against a release branch. If the
push trigger has no branch restriction and pull_request is also
configured, every push to a branch with an open PR runs the workflow
twice: once for the push and once for the PR synchronisation.

Always give the push trigger an explicit list of branches: this stops
branches created from a release branch from inheriting its workflow
runs.

see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=430408443#GitHubActionsRecommendedPractices-Restrictthepushtriggertospecificbranches

ignoring only dependabot branches as it seems that several feature
branches are created on the main Apache tinkerpop repository. The
dependabot case should already cut most if the duplicate workload

Signed-off-by: Aurélien Pupier <apupier@ibm.com>
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.24%. Comparing base (a28cd1f) to head (af1a18b).
⚠️ Report is 179 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3500      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     76.35%   76.24%   -0.12%     
- Complexity    13424    13899     +475     
============================================
  Files          1012     1030      +18     
  Lines         60341    62759    +2418     
  Branches       7075     7350     +275     
============================================
+ Hits          46076    47852    +1776     
- Misses        11548    11932     +384     
- Partials       2717     2975     +258     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants