Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
chrismaree
left a comment
chrismaree
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed against L-01 / FRO-147 at 9e8e739. Initialization through an alias and the rules/reward/manual re-request/budget mutations now emit the canonical ID, matching the existing automatic callback paths. _canonicalRequestId retains the registration check and mutations still reach the same shared state. The README explains alias mapping, per-ID resolution/delivery events, and deduplication after callback rollback. Keeping event signatures unchanged is reasonable here: the registration tuple and getRequestId supply the association needed by indexers. The alias lifecycle regression and P4-budget documentation address the prior feedback.
Static code and test review; no tests or builds run. Reconcile the callback documentation with #80 when combining those independent changes.
2 participants
Use the canonical request ID for shared reporter lifecycle events, including when an alias initializes the request or changes its rules, reward, or re-request budget. Keep existing event signatures and document how indexers map aliases to the shared lifecycle, distinguish callback delivery, and deduplicate resolution events.
Base: #76. Tracks FRO-147 (L-01).
Validation: the alias lifecycle regression fails on the base and passes with the fix; all 69 reporter tests pass, including upgrade tests. Formatting and diff checks pass.