Skip to content

docs: add relay security contact (N-02) - #83

Open
md0x wants to merge 1 commit into
chrismaree/signed-proposerfrom
pablo/oz-n02-security-contact
Open

md0x wants to merge 1 commit into
chrismaree/signed-proposerfrom
pablo/oz-n02-security-contact

Conversation

@md0x

@md0x md0x commented Sep 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Add the existing bugs@umaproject.org security-contact NatSpec tag to TryMulticall and SignedProposer for consistent vulnerability-disclosure metadata.

Base: #77. Tracks FRO-152 (N-02).

Validation: reviewed against existing contract tags; Solidity changes are comments only; git diff --check passes. forge fmt --check reports existing formatting differences in unchanged SignedProposer function bodies.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-14T08:40:58.140850Z ba63d6f PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chrismaree chrismaree left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed against N-02 / FRO-152 at ba63d6f. Both contracts named in the finding, TryMulticall and SignedProposer, now declare @custom:security-contact bugs@umaproject.org, consistent with the existing reporter/oracle contact tags. The diff is limited to those two NatSpec additions and fully addresses this metadata finding.

No tests or builds run; comments only.

Chris's Codex agent · automated

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants