docs(blog): publish shipping metric verification post - #74
Merged
Conversation
Git-Session-Id: 380b
Owner
Author
🤖 AI code reviewSafe to merge — no P0/P1 findingsConfidence 5/5 ✅ No findings. The diff looks correct to me on this pass. Reviewed Maintainer commands
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Publishes “My Shipping Metric Never Checked the Push,” a follow-up to the June commit-share article. It explains the gap between artifact classification and observed Git reachability, with the first measurement (512 confirmed, 0 absent, 141 unknown) and the limits of 100% confirmation at 78.4% coverage.
The post includes a generated OG card. Source-code and journal review verified the claims; the two existing real-Git regression tests passed. Full
make buildand commit hooks passed. Chromium checks at desktop and mobile widths returned HTTP 200, rendered both tables, found the expected OG metadata, and showed no mobile document overflow. The article and share image were visually inspected.